Visual Field Loss in Social Security Disability Blindness Cases - Melvin
If you require to file disability claim, or disability benefits in Utah, contact Salt Lake City social security & disability benefits attorney Melvin Cook.
Logo 801-746-5075
9571 South 700 East, Suite 104 Sandy, , UT 84070
Call: 801-746-5075

Visual Field Loss in Social Security Disability Blindness Cases

by Melvin Cook

RECENT POSTS
  • Case Management Conferences in Domestic Relations Cases

    Case Management Conferences in Domestic Relations Cases  Read more...

  • BIFF Your Way to Successful Communications with Your Ex-Spouse

    BIFF Your Way to Successful Communications with Your Ex-Spouse  Read more...

Social Security regulations provide for a finding of statutory blindness based on visual field loss when the widest diameter of vision of the better eye subtends an angle of no more than 20 degrees.

In order to measure visual fields, automated static threshold perimetry testing is used.

This measures the retina’s sensitivity to light at predetermined locations in the visual field. The individual focuses on a fixed point, called the point of fixation, while visual stimuli appear in random order at each of the predetermined locations in the visual field. The size and location of the stimulus are constant but the intensity (brightness) is varied in order to determine the level at which the individual sees the stimulus. The level at which the individual sees the stimulus is referred to as the threshold. The threshold for each point tested is reported in terms of decibels (dB).

Standard charts are used to map the results of the automated static threshold perimetry.

Social Security Ruling (SSR) 07-01p gives guidance on interpreting the standard charts.

The test is acceptable If it complies with certain requirements: 1) the test must be performed on a perimeter that satisfies the statutory requirements; 2) the test uses white size III Goldmann stimulus and a 31.5 apostilb (asb) white background; 3) the points tested are no more than 6 degrees apart horizontally and vertically; and 4) the test measures the central 24 to 30 degrees of the visual field; that is, the area measuring 24 to 30 degrees around the point of fixation.

The Humphrey Field Analyzer (at least as of the date of the social security ruling) was the most widely used test in the United States. The Humphrey Field Analyzer central 30.2 threshold test (HFA 30-2) and 24-2 threshold test (HFA 24-2) are tests that meet the criteria. The HFA 30-2 tests 76 points in the central 30 degrees of the visual field. The HFA 24-2 tests 54 points in the central 24 degrees of the visual field. These are acceptable tests when performed using a white size III stimulus on a white 31.5 asb background.

The mean deviation (MD) is an important measurement in determining whether an individual has visual field loss.

For the Humphrey Field Analyzer, the reliability factors for testing are fixation losses, false positive errors, and false negative errors. The results are not reliable is the fixation losses are greater than 20 percent or if the false positive or negative errors are greater than 33 percent. Even if these reliability factors are met, social security will not consider the test results to be reliable if they are inconsistent with other information in the case file, such as clinical findings or the individual’s activities of daily living.

For acceptable tests of a Humphrey Field Analyzer, visual field loss is indicated if the MD measures -5dB. If the MD is equal to or greater than -5dB, then the visual field is considered normal.

The Social Security Ruling gives very detailed and technical guidance for determining whether there is statutory blindness based on visual field loss. Basically, the extent of visual field loss is measured by determining the portion of the visual field in which the individual can see a white III4e stimulus. The III refers to the standard Goldmann stimulus test size III. The “4e” refers to the standard Goldmann filters used to determine the intensity of the stimulus. Therefore, a determination must be made as to the dB level that corresponds to a 4e intensity for the particular perimeter being used. Points that are at or above this dB level are considered “seeing points”, because they are equal in intensity or dimmer than a 4e stimulus. Points that are at or below this dB level are considered “non-seeing points”, because they are brighter than a 4e stimulus.

For acceptable tests done of a Humphrey Field Analyzer, the db level corresponding to a 4e stimulus is 10dB. Therefore, any point with a threshold equal to or greater than 10 dB is a “seeing point” and any point with a threshold below 10 dB is a “non-seeing” point.

Next, the adjudicator uses the dB printout to determine if the widest diameter of the field is less than or equal to 20 degrees. The diameter must pass through the point of fixation. In order to make this determination, the adjudicator draws a line, called a pseudoisopter, midway between the seeing and non-seeing points. For an acceptable Humphrey Field Analyzer test, this would be a line between any two adjacent points where the threshold is 10 dB and higher and those where the threshold is less than 10 dB. If any number at the outermost edge of the field is a seeing point, a line is drawn at that outermost edge. If more than one number is shown for a particular point, the higher number is used to determine whether the point is a seeing point.

The psuedoisopter is used to differentiate between the seeing portion of the visual field and the non-seeing portion. The pseudoisopter itself is considered part of the seeing portion of the visual field.

In measuring the widest diameter of the visual field, the distance between points is calculated. On a printout from a Humphrey Field Analyzer test, each tested point is 6 degrees apart vertically or horizontally from an adjacent point. The four tested points immediately surrounding the point of fixation are each 3 degrees horizontally and vertically from the point of fixation. Any point adjacent to an axis is 3 degrees apart from that axis. On a Humphrey Field Analyzer printout, there are hashmarks on the horizontal and vertical axes, each of which are 10 degrees apart. The degrees are divided equally between the hashmarks.

In measuring the widest diameter of the visual field, the length of any scotoma (or non-seeing area), other than the normal “blind spot” is subtracted from the overall length of any diameter on which it falls. (On some Humphrey Field Analyzer dB printouts, the blind spot is identified by a small triangle). The pseudoisopter is not subtracted from the overall length of the diameter because it is considered a seeing point.

If widest diameter of the visual field of the better eye is less than or equal to 20 degrees and the test is consistent with the other evidence in the case file, the person is considered statutorily blind. For title II (Disability Insurance Benefit, or “DIB”, cases as opposed to SSI cases), there must be a medically determinable impairment causing the visual field loss.

If the individual has severe visual field loss that does not result in statutory blindness, then the adjudicator will consider whether or not the visual disorder meets or equals listing 2.03B or 102.03B. The listing(s) is met when the MD for the better eye, using a Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 test (an HFA 24-2 test cannot be used to determine a listing) is -22 dB or worse. IF the listing is not met or equaled, then the adjudicator will assess the limitations imposed by the visual disorder and accompanying field loss.

This material should not be construed as legal advice for any particular fact situation, but is intended for general informational purposes only. For advice specific to any individual situation, an experienced attorney should be contacted.

Contact a Salt Lake City Attorney Committed to Protecting Your Rights

When it comes the family law and social security disability, each client and case is different. It is also important to select an attorney with the experience, skills and professionalism required to address your legal issues. To learn more, contact the Salt Lake City law offices of Melvin A. Cook and schedule an initial consultation to discuss your case.

    * fields are required